i am no friend of mine [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
David R Williams

[ website | Shit Happens ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Links
[Links:| My sweetest girl ]
[I said DON'T give up the day job!| My webcomic ]

Chekov [Jul. 8th, 2009|01:02 am]
Latest comic is taking longer than expected because I appear to have had all the Art punched out of me. Drawing basic things like two people in a room is a daunting Herculean task where I have to redraw every line five times to get it in place. Photoshop isn't helping by refusing to run properly when I have anything else open, because dammit Adobe products need 100% of your processor time, not 95%. This will become a bigger problem tomorrow when I start colouring the thing, because the act of converting one of the greyscale comic pages into RGB immediately makes the machine stutter to a halt and causes long, Kasparov-like pauses between each action.

In other news, I finished reading 'The Kite Runner' by Khaled Hosseini today. It's not bad. Not as good as I was led to believe, but not bad. I think a large part of its success is owed to cultural slumming, whereby middle class white intellectual idiots like me read books about other cultures and horrible poverty before fluttering our lashes, cow-like, and imagining that we're somehow attuned to a more noble culture than this horrible Western capitalist materialist society we despise and depend upon so much. The worst part of 'The Kite Runner', without a doubt, is the story's climax in which a story about a weak-willed, shy chap trying to come to terms with never living up to his father's expectations while struggling with the discovery that his father did not live up to his own expectations suddenly takes a left turn and spends three scenes as a Hollywood blockbuster in which astronomical coincidence and cosmic irony draw multiple threads together. It's such a jarringly badly-written plot point that it completely brings you out of the story and destroys the emotional intimacy you've made with the characters.
It's not so much Chekov's gun being brought out of the drawer as it is Chekov's desk being bought by someone's uncle while simultaneously an orphan girl who found the key to Chekov's desk drawer grows up and marries the nephew, at which point a wild tiger attacks the nephew only to have him realise that not only is he holding the key, but is standing in his uncle's study, with just enough time to get the gun out of the drawer and shoot the tiger. Well, okay, maybe it's a little less blatant than that, but it's really just an improbability too far to maintain suspension of disbelief.

Tomorrow: a new book, and colour for the comic.
linkpost comment

Abstruse [Jul. 1st, 2009|10:54 pm]


Having been reading David Foster Wallace's 'The Infinite Jest' since, oh, last September/October or so, it's a relief to finally finish. Admittedly, I took several months off in between when we were doing the comic a couple of times a week so I really didn't have free time. Now I can read some of the shorter, less dense works that have been piling up in the meantime: 'As I Lay Dying', 'The Kite Runner', the dictionary...
Perhaps the biggest problem the Infinite Jest has is that it doesn't quite make it to the end without tipping its hand and letting you in on the joke, or, indeed, the jest. It's got some great concepts, a lot of comedic scenes, and some major foreshadowing of the depression and eventual suicide that was apparently eating away at Wallace like a cancer for much of his life. It poses more questions than it ever answers, yet still probably answers more than it should. A large amount of effort is put into deliberate attempts to disorient the reader, be it with the shifting/overlapping mass of the hundred-plus characters, or the intentional obfuscation of the timeline via 'subsidized time', flashbacks, dream sequences, hallucinations, or the copious amount of footnotes that serve to jag you back and forth from the narrative to the endnotes of the book like a literary tennis match.
I'm left with the overwhelming impression that this is the kind of book that grows on you, and once it gets inside your head you're doomed to have it gestate in there until one day you can't stop yourself from picking it up and, provided your spine can hold out, devouring the whole thing in a fraction of the time it took you the first time around.
link3 comments|post comment

Commenting on LJ does not give any app access to all of your personal shit [Jun. 30th, 2009|12:06 am]
Hello! Some of you might remember me from such times as When I Used To Post and When I Used To Be Funny.
Here is a meme; feel free to comment with your answers, or not. All comments screened unless specifically requested otherwise. If screened, the only one that will see them will be me. Well, I'll probably read any funny bits to Mary, but you should expect couples to talk about you behind your back by now anyway, and if you're anything like me you find it completely impossible to write anything anywhere without assuming some audience is reading it and, like Tom Cruise, silently judging you.

This shit is memetic, M - E - M - E - T - I - C. )
linkpost comment

(no subject) [Jun. 17th, 2009|11:25 pm]
Twitter has a chequered history of breaking the second the wind blows too hard; how the hell has it managed to stand up to the last three or four days of mass usage and remain intact? Especially given that they put off scheduled maintenance in order to act as the de facto pigeon post of Iran's post-election blowup?

Also:
Photobucket
link1 comment|post comment

Why are you an atheist? [Jun. 10th, 2009|05:44 pm]
The subject of religion came up at work and one of my co-workers made it apparent that she thought I was, as a matter of course, a Christian. It was an unspoken assumption on her part: whether I went to church or not or read the Bible didn't really enter into her assessment, but the implication was clear: unless you've said different and you're not visibly from a different culture entirely, I'm going to assume you're a Christian. I gently corrected her on the point: 'I'm an atheist, but yes, I'm familiar with the Bible.'

The first question she asked was 'Why are you an atheist?' We'll come back to that one later. The second question she asked was 'So when something bad happens, something terrible, then you don't pray or ask any god for help?' My answer was no. I went on to explain how that's one of the things that sucks about being someone that was raised Christian and later became atheist. The whole time I was growing up, when something bad happened and there was nothing I could physically do to change what would happen, there was always this comfort I could retreat to. Put your hands together, ask God to help. When you said 'amen', then no matter how crappy things were before, you could at least feel like you'd done something. You weren't helpless.
Later on I was asked, when explaining this to another co-worker, why I don't just start praying. If it sucks so bad to know that I can't do anything now that I'm an atheist, why not just become a Christian again? My answer was that it's not that simple. Even if I wanted to become a Christian again, which I don't, then I can't just suddenly start believing in something that I don't believe in. I'd be saying words to an empty sky.

A better analogy is this: the reason I don't pray for help when things go wrong is the same reason I don't call to Superman. I can read books from before I was born that tell me how Superman is able to leap tall buildings in a single bound (and later, fly), how he can stop bullets with his body, how his father sent him to Earth and how he grew to love and embrace humanity before eventually, in 1996, dying to save the world from evil before miraculously being born again. And I can see the power of Superman doing good through his followers. I've heard about how the Superman radio show brought the secrets of the Ku Klux Klan out into the open and revealed them for the silly, superstitious idiots they were, effectively ending any kind of degree of seriousness that people placed upon them. I know these things, and yet I don't call Superman for help because I know he isn't real.
The big difference is, of course, that Superman was created in 1938. We know who invented him, we know all the various creators that have written and illustrated his adventures. The Bible goes back a lot further. It contains a mixture of historically verifiable fact and more dubious narrative. (By comparison, we know there was a historical Adolf Hitler, but are pretty sure Superman never punched him while hawking war bonds.) Evidence that parts of Biblical stories are true does not necessarily mean that the whole of the story is true. And that's all an aside anyway. It doesn't matter if I believe that the narratives of the Bible played out that way in real life, because I don't believe there's a God. That's a major sticking point no matter which of the big three religions I go into. That's where this Superman point came in: I don't believe in Superman. It doesn't really matter why I think Superman isn't real, bottom line is I'm not likely to suddenly start believing Superman is real and entreating him for help.

All of which makes me sound like one of those militant atheists fucks like Bill Maher, Christopher Hitchens, or Richard Dawkins. I don't want to convince people to become atheists. I firmly believe that I have no more right telling someone what they can or can't believe in than I do in telling a woman what she can or can't do with a parasitical clump of cells that's taken up residence in her uterine wall. If you don't like abortions, fine. Don't have one. If you don't believe in God, ditto.
Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are all perfectly good belief systems. They're built around books that have historical narratives and little stories about being nice to people and not being a dick and how people should behave to each other. The problems come in when people get involved and want other people to follow the rules in their books. Medical, legal or fiscal policy should no more be made on the strength of one religion's storybook than it should on a Superman comic. To me, this seems like common sense. To a lot of religious people, this also makes perfect sense. It's only the people who want to make laws based on their own dogma that I have a problem with, be they Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, atheist or any of the other many, many, stances you can take under the umbrella of 'personal beliefs'.

The fact that I don't believe in your God does not mean I think you're an idiot, which is perhaps where the Superman analogy falls flattest. I don't believe. You do. But neither of us know. If either of us says that we know - 'I know God is real and loves me'/'I know there is no God and life is essentially meaningless' - then that makes us fools. You believe you know there is a God, at most.
No-one can say for certain that there is or isn't a god, they can only attest to their own belief on the matter. The important thing is that you have that choice: to believe, or not to believe. If you're basically a decent person and aren't trying to impose dogma on people based on the Bible or the Torah or the Qu'ran or the Superman 80-Page Giant, then I'm just glad you have something that lets you be that decent person.

And that brings me back to the first question I was asked: 'Why Are You An Atheist?' There's not really a good answer, just bits of answers. I'm an atheist because I don't believe in a deity, that's a pretty big one. Because I was a Christian for the first sixteen or seventeen years of my life and in that time there was enough that didn't add up or make sense or hold together with catch-all proverbs like 'God has a plan' that it finally made more sense that there is no god, never was, never has been. Because I learned, probably most importantly, about stories, and about the power of stories, and the value of truth in stories whether the story itself is true or not. It's not my lack of a cohesive answer that is flawed; it's the question.
I can't imagine myself, with a straight face, asking someone 'Why are you a Christian?' The question itself seems geared towards making someone apologise for something, justify something that's essentially a personal choice you shouldn't really have to justify to anyone outside the darkness of your own skull.

Why am I an atheist? I am that I am, that's why.
link2 comments|post comment

Writer's Block: AKA [Jun. 2nd, 2009|11:29 pm]
[Tags|, ]

What's the story behind your username?


View other answers



Photobucket


Seriously.
link2 comments|post comment

I can only think of two 'Bing' jokes [May. 28th, 2009|10:33 pm]
Microsoft, in partnership with Matthew Perry, are relaunching their search engine at Bing.com.
Search engines are one of those notoriously odd beasts in web terms: they're pretty much the backbone of internet from a user point of view. I remember back in the day it used to be Yahoo, Ask Jeeves and AltaVista fighting for our affections. Nowadays, Ask Jeeves dropped the butler's name and spends most of its budget advertising to confused non-internet users who like the idea of typing a question into a box and having a friendly animated Wodehouse character help them gently along the way. Yahoo is a shadow of its former self, having had pretty much every trick stolen out from under it and improved upon by Google, once the new kid on the block and now a verb in its own right. (Speaking of Yahoo, by the way, anyone else hear that GeoCities is closing its doors forever later this year? It's as if a million shitty 'my first webpage' pages cried for attention with badly-looped animated gifs at once and then were suddenly silenced.) Is AltaVista even around any more? I could just check the URL, I guess, but I'd probably get a better answer if Googled it first.
In fact, about the only thing approaching the ubiquity of Google these days is Wikipedia, which is the top search result for so many things that at this point I'm sure most people after general information on a topic will ask Wikipedia first and Google specifics.

Microsoft's biggest stumbling block with Bing is - in addition to naming the site after the most expensive machine in the whole hospital - a recent lousy track record with innovation. Microsoft have become pretty adept at taking someone else's concept and making it their own. Is the Zune a resounding success? No, but it's got a radio, it can sync wirelessly, and it doesn't run off god damn iTunes, upon all of which the iPod trips.
Microsoft's forays into innovation usually include disastrous debuts, followed by six months of nightly updates that work like a cabin boy trying to stop a holed ocean liner from sinking armed only with his bucket. Microsoft really only come into their own on the second version of a product, and unfortunately, by the time they've got that far, someone else has taken their idea and worked out the kinks before they did, thus becoming the first workable version on the market.

If Bing somehow defeats the odds and becomes the wonderfully accurate search engine they claim it will be, that gathers and presents relevant information without extraneous clicking, could they implement the same technology for their help menus? Every damn day I have to go look something up in the help menus of Access, and every day it takes me four times as long as it needs to because the entire layout of help is like having a blind man look things up in a dictionary in which the letters are arranged according to a Dvorak keyboard layout.

In fact, it's so bad, I usually just turn to Google.
link2 comments|post comment

Clearly our totem animal [May. 20th, 2009|10:52 pm]
Photobucket

...and that's how I met Mary.
linkpost comment

I just know I'm going to have to explain this one [May. 18th, 2009|11:26 pm]
Q. Why shouldn't you ever have children, David?

A.
Photobucket Photobucket
link9 comments|post comment

You're a Devil, Harry [May. 16th, 2009|09:30 pm]
According to a newsletter by cult leader Tony Alamo that was left under our windscreen wipers while we were eating dinner -- windscreen wipers being where I get most of my reliable news -- I am apparently a devil. To wit:

Photobucket

If there's one thing that's probably going to guarantee I'm not going to join your cult, it's calling me a devil before you've even met me. How rude!
link7 comments|post comment

May Day [May. 1st, 2009|10:59 pm]
Photobucket

Happy May Day, everyone!

link4 comments|post comment

Open-ended #3 [Apr. 29th, 2009|11:50 pm]
[Tags|]

This week's 'Open-Ended' isn't exactly a question, more a prompt. It's also a classic! Answers-plus-responses posted next week; comments are screened in case you run out of room in the text box.

Poll #1392217 Open-Ended 3
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: None

You are in an open field west of a big white house with a boarded front door. There is a small mailbox here. > _

linkpost comment

Open-ended answers, week two [Apr. 28th, 2009|08:17 pm]
[Tags|]

Last week, I asked you the question:

Cake or death?





[info]little_dinosaur
Oh god, it's like I'm back at birthday parties of my childhood. I really don't like cake okay, Kailyn's mom! Do with me what you will but you'll never make me eat it.
[info]deathboy
I'll have the chicken, please.
[info]joellevand
Um...death. No, I mean CAKE!

[info]serizawa3000
cake
[info]rick_day
DEATH BY CHOCOLATE CAKE!
[info]ashton_blaze
why can't we have death by cake?

[info]the__seeker
This girl at work who praises me endlessly for my cooking (i come in early three days a week and cook breakfast for a bunch of us) says that i should look into becoming a cake decorator as it is apparently serious kaching. So i choose cake.
[info]evil_egg
"Well, we're OUTTA cake! We only had three bits and we didn't expect such a rush!"
[info]wreakjavik
Death please.... oh, I'm sorry, I meant cake.

[info]haltedgrace
Death cakes?

link6 comments|post comment

At least it's not Michael Moore [Apr. 28th, 2009|02:16 pm]
Arlen Specter may have just temporarily elevated Al Franken to the position of being the most important figure in US party politics. That's weird.
No weirder probably than, say, a cowboy actor becoming President, or an Austrian bodybuilder (who was once the world's first pregnant man!) becoming Governor of California, but it's still an odd thing to happen in anyone's book.
I only ever saw one Al Franken movie, and I hated it from beginning to end. I never saw him on SNL, never listened to his radio show or read his books.
So, opinion time: if Al Franken becomes the key 60th Senator siding with the Democrats, what are the best and worst things we can expect?
link2 comments|post comment

Open-ended #2 [Apr. 22nd, 2009|09:01 pm]
It's time for another open-ended question!

Poll #1388352 Open-Ended 2
This poll is closed.
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: None

Cake... or death?



I know a choice between two different options doesn't seem very 'open-ended', but here's why it is, for two reasons:
1. It's a text box, not radio buttons for the express purpose of Showing Your Working should you wish;
and
2. Comments are enabled, but screened for this post only, because looking at other people's answers ahead of time is cheating.
linkpost comment

RUN. [Apr. 21st, 2009|12:41 am]
Photobucket

...one of the best movies I've seen in a long time.
link2 comments|post comment

1 + 1 = 2 [Apr. 17th, 2009|12:09 pm]
Cigarette smuggling may be on the rise, reports the Philadelphia Inquirer.

Who would have thought that the more you hike tax rates up to artificially increase the price of something, in order to both plug budget gaps and 'punish' unpopular groups (in this case smokers), the more likely people are to exploit this in order to make a profit?
See, the thing about this is that states are abusing the ability to set cigarette tax. They need to strike the happy medium where the tax rate is going to be profitable, but not so high that it puts people off altogether. As long as you can buy cheap cigarettes from out of state and untaxed ones online, the tax rate is little incentive for anyone to quit, so that argument's gone. If you say you need the tax revenue to offset healthcare costs, that's all very well, but if you're driving people to buy untaxed and out of state cigarettes, that argument has all the buoyancy of a sieve as well.

I like the level of pot-kettle-black being shown by the states in this case: You can't tack your own profit margin onto something and resell it; that's our racket.

Given that we're accepting that socially unpopular activities can be taxed in order to punish people going against the majority view, what else can we tax that would a) be a good way of making money for the state and b) have this level of acceptance by the public as a whole?
I'll get you started: much as I disagree with it, I'd have to go with caffeine. It's a widely-used substance, but has definite health drawbacks and isn't a necessity.

Any others?
link5 comments|post comment

Answers to previous question: [Apr. 17th, 2009|07:46 am]
Previously: I asked the question Any questions?
There were six takers. Here are the answers:






link2 comments|post comment

Open ended: [Apr. 16th, 2009|01:05 am]
Poll #1384508
This poll is closed.
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All

Any questions?

link1 comment|post comment

SECONDHAND CAR FUMES KILL BABIES OMG WTF [Apr. 8th, 2009|10:45 pm]
Well, researchers are finally saying they found the link between traffic pollution and low birth weights. Guess it's time to start banning people from driving like they banned people from smoking in public. I mean, shit, if traffic pollution is this hazardous to people's health, we need to make sure no-one is exposed to traffic fumes, right? It's all very well to say people should just not be near heavily trafficked areas if they're in a risk group, but fuck that! What if tollbooth operator is the only job someone can get? Don't they have a right to not be exposed to traffic fumes?
link1 comment|post comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]